From all this, two notions of rationality result: the first attached to the dominant form of power and deprived of any normative force; the second characterized, on the contrary, by a liberating force based on a yet-to-come scenario. In 1938, Adorno joined the Institute after spending some time as an advanced student at Merton College, Oxford. Crucial in this sense is the understanding and the criticism of the notion of “ideology”. It is most closely associated with the work of Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse. Under Horkheimer, the Frankfurt School will study horoscopes, movies, jazz, sexual repression, the sado-masochistic impulses at the heart of fascism, and reconfigure Marxist theory in the light of the publication in the early 1930s of Marx’s early Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts. Horkheimer’s leadership provided a very distinct methodological direction and philosophical grounding to the research interests of the Institute. University of Rome Tor Vergata If, as Weber believed, modern rationalization of society came to a formal reduction of the power of rationality, it followed that hyper-bureaucratization of society led not just to a complete separation between facts and values but also to a total disinterest in the latter forms. The discussion about method has been always a constant topic for those critical theorists who have attempted since the beginning to clarify the specificity of what it means to be “critical”. Adorno returned to Germany in August 1953 and was soon involved again in empirical research, combining quantitative and qualitative methods in the analysis of industrial relations for the Mannesmann Company. By the use of historical conceptual reconstruction and normative speculation, Brunkhorst presented the pathologies of the contemporary globalized world and the function that solidarity would play. If traditional theory is evaluated by considering its practical implications, then no practical consequences can be actually inferred. Critical Theory, instead, characterizes itself as a method contrary to the “fetishization” of knowledge, one which considers knowledge as something rather functional to ideology critique and social emancipation. Honneth, Axel. Dialectics, as a method of social criticism, was interpreted as following from the contradictory nature of capitalism as a system of exploitation. In 1923, Felix decided to use his father’s money to found an institute specifically devoted to the study of German society in the light of a Marxist approach. In 1930, Max Horkheimer succeeded to Grünberg. Nancy Fraser, instead, by focusing on the notion of redistribution has provided key elements in understanding how it is possible to overcome economic inequalities and power-imbalances in post-industrial societies where cultural affiliations are no longer significant sources of power. Critical Theory in the narrow sense designates several generations of German philosophers and social theorists in the Western European Marxist tradition known as the Frankfurt School. Two years later Horkheimer published the ideological manifesto of the School in his Traditional and Critical Theory ([1937] 1976) where he readdressed some of the previously introduced topics concerning the practical and critical turn of theory. The activity of the analyst in this sense is not far from the same activity of the participant: there is no objective perspective which can be defended. Normatively, though, acts of social struggle activated by forms of misrecognition point to the role that recognition plays as a crucial criterion for grounding intersubjectivity. Besides his achievements, both in academia and as an activist, the young Habermas contributed towards the construction of a critical self-awareness of the socialist student groups around the country (the so-called SDS, Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund). In order to understand what the significance of the theory/practice problem is, it is useful to refer back to David Hume’s “is/ought” question. The stakes are far too high to choose non-involvement. In 1956, Habermas joined the Institute as Adorno’s assistant. This move is aimed at suggesting an alternative and hopefully more coherent route of explanation for the understanding of the liberal constitutional experience (Forst, [2007] 2014, see also Forst, [2010] 2011). Benhabib’s views, by making explicit several Habermasian assumptions, aim to countervail both post-structuralist worries as well as post-modern charges of political action ineffectiveness of Critical Theory models. However, in 1930, under the directorship of Max Horkheimer, the organization moved to America to escape the Nazis, and began to concentrate on critical theory. The central message is that Critical Theory, while drawing from Marxism, must avoid hypostatization and closure into a single Weltanschauung on the pain of losing its “critical” capacity. Cultural Marxism and its Critical Theory were developed coincident to the 1923 founding of the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University. Since the 1970s, a second generation began with Jürgen Habermas, who, among other merits, contributed to the opening of a dialogue between so-called continental and the analytic traditions. Interestingly, and not surprisingly, one of the major topics of study was Nazism. He claimed that it was only when the conditions of truth, rightness and sincerity were raised by speech-acts that social coordination could be obtained. What has been noticed is that whereas Critical Theory has aimed at fostering human emancipation, it has remained incapable of specifying a political action-strategy for social change. Other fellows like Marcuse, Pollock and Adorno followed shortly, whereas some remained in New York. What The Authoritarian Personality was really studying was the character type of a totalitarian rather than an authoritarian society. Habermas obtained his Habilitation under the supervision of Abendroth at Marburg, where he addressed the topic of the bourgeois formation of public sphere. This work represents a mature expansion of what was partially addressed in his dissertation, a work published under the title of Critique of Power: Stages of Reflection of a Critical Social Theory (1991 [1985]). The Institute for Social Research thus became affiliated with Columbia University until 1949, when it returned to Frankfurt. It was in this context that Habermas reacted to the extremism of Rudi Dutschke, the radical leader of the students’ association who criticized him for defending a non-effective emancipatory view. Horkheimer was involved in the administration of the university, whereas Adorno was constantly occupied with different projects and teaching duties. This decade was crucial for the definition of the School’s research objectives. Most of them disavowed orthodox Marxism, though they remained deeply critical of capitalism. Critical Theory has the following tasks: to clarify the sociopolitical determinants that explain the limits of analysis of a certain philosophical view as well as to transcend the use of imagination—the actual limits of imagination. To this puzzle critical theorists have provided different answers, such that it is not possible to regroup them into a homogeneous set of views. While Derrida’s deconstructive method has shown how binary opposition collapses when applied to the semantic level, so that meaning can only be contextually constructed, Foucault has oriented his criticisms to the supposedly emancipatory power of universal reason by showing how forms of domination permeate micro-levels of power-control such as in sanatoriums, educational and religious bodies and so on. In his collections of essays, The Right to Justification, Forst suggests a transformation of the Habermasian “co-originality thesis” into a monistic “right to justification”. Pollock’s critical reinterpretation of Marx received support also from intellectuals who greatly contributed to later developments of the School as, for instance, in the case of Leo Lowenthal, Theodor Wiesengrund-Adorno and Erich Fromm. According to The Frankfurt School the cultural industry and mass culture, “. One marshaled by Neumann, Gurland and Kirchheimer and oriented mainly to the analysis of legal and political issues by consideration of economic substructures; the other, instead, guided by Horkheimer and focusing on the notion of psychological irrationalism as a source of obedience and domination (see Jay 1996, p. 166). He built himself a bungalow near other German intellectuals, among whom were Bertold Brecht and Thomas Mann as well as with other people interested in working for the film industry (Wiggershaus 1995, p. 292). By signing up for this email, you are agreeing to news, offers, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica. In this respect, Habermas defined these as the “unavoidable pragmatic presuppositions of mutual understanding”. In 1941, Horkheimer moved to Pacific Palisades, near Los Angeles. The confrontation with American debate, initiated systematically by the work of Habermas, became soon an obsolete issue in the third generation of critical theorists—not only because the group was truly international, merging European and American scholars. In the already mentioned work—>Dialectic of Enlightenment (1969 [1947])—Horkheimer and Adorno emphasized the role of knowledge and technology as a “means of exploitation” of labor and viewed the dialectic of reason as the archetypical movement of human self-liberation. From these conceptually rich implications one can observe some of the constant topics which have characterized critical social theory, that is, the normativity of social philosophy as something distinct from classical descriptive sociology, the everlasting crux on the theory/practice relation and, finally, ideology critique. 292 ff. A further line of reflection on the theory/practice problem comes from psychoanalysis where a strict separation has been maintained between the “is” and “ought” and false “oughts” have been unmasked through the clarification of the psychological mechanisms constructing desires. . Indeed, his communitarian turn has been paralleled by the work of some of his fellow scholars. “The Intellectual legacy of Critical Theory”, in Fred Rush (ed.). Adorno, Theodor W. “Freudian Theory and the Pattern of Fascist Propaganda” (1951), in Arato, Andrew and Eike Gebhardt (eds.). Critical Theory has a narrow and a broad meaning in philosophy and in the history of the social sciences. These events marked the precise intellectual phase of maturity reached at that time by the Frankfurt School. Updates? It was originally located at the Institute for Social Research (Institut für Sozialforschung), an attached institute at the Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany. This rebuttal reopened the demands of transcendental conditions for immanent criticism revealed along the same pragmatic conditions of social criticism. Not long after its inception, the Institute for Social Research was formally recognized by the Ministry of Education as an entity attached to Goethe University Frankfurt. Adorno, Erich Fromm, Herbert Marcuse, and Walter Benjamin. How can one provide an account of class interests after the collapse of classes? Critical Theory and Habermas, in particular, are no exception to these view on rationality, since they both see Ideologiekritik not just as a form of “moralizing criticism”, but as a form of knowledge, that is, as a cognitive operation for disclosing the falsity of conscience (Geuss 1981, p. 26). In the 1950s the critical theorists of the Frankfurt School diverged in several intellectual directions. Derrida, for instance, while pointing to the Habermasian idea of pragmatic of communication, still maintained a distinct thesis of a restless deconstructive potential of any constructing activity, so that no unavoidable pragmatic presuppositions nor idealizing conditions of communication could survive deconstruction. From enlightenment, rationality to mass culture and other fields, The Frankfurt School established its own theoretical framework through criticism to cure the wounds of the capitalist system. Ring in the new year with a Britannica Membership, This article was most recently revised and updated by, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frankfurt-School, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Frankfurt School and Critical Theory. Accordingly, for the Frankfurt School, modern processes of bureaucratic administration exemplified what Weber considered as an all-encompassing domination of formal rationality over substantive values. Even if characterized by several internal differences, what Critical Theory added to this debate was the consideration both of the anthropological as well as the psychological dynamics motivating masses and structuring ideologies. Accordingly, the use of reason did not amount to formulating prescriptive models of society but aimed at achieving goals through the selection of the best possible means of action. Let’s begin by considering the corrosive work of th e Frankfurt School: a group of German-American scholars, mostly Jewish, who developed highly provocative and original perspectives on contemporary society and culture, drawing on Hegel, Marx, Freud, and Weber. On the other hand, if one takes “ideology” according to a positive sense, then, reference is not with something empirically given, but rather with a “desideratum”, a “verité a faire” (Geuss 1981, p. 23). Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). Accordingly, critical theorists like Fromm referred to Freud’s notions of the unconscious which contributed defining ideologies in terms of “substitute gratifications”. To this views, Habermas has objected that any activity of rational criticism presupposes unavoidable conditions in order to justify the pretence of validity of its same exercise. Their idea of a “cultural revolution” was not particularly new. In his turn, Alessandro Ferrara along his recent monograph The Democratic Horizon (2014), has revived the paradigm of political liberalism by addressing the significance of democracy and tackled next the problem of hypepluralism and multiple democracies. In the latter case, there seems to be required an extra layer of justification, namely, a process through which a norm can be defined as valid. ), Adorno provides a short but dense interpretation in eight theses on the significance and the mission of Critical Theory. Email: Claudio.Corradetti@uniroma2.it After a period of academic appointments in Berlin and Konstanz, in 1996 he took Habermas’ chair in Frankfurt. It was Fromm, nevertheless, who achieved a significant advancement of the discipline; his central aim was to provide, through a synthesis of Marxism and psychoanalysis, “the missing link between ideological superstructure and socio-economic base” (Jay 1966, p. 92). Such a revision of Marxian categories became extremely crucial, then, in the reinterpretation of the notion of dialectics for the analysis of capitalism. Never one to buck a populist trend, the political establishment in America has fully embrace… Some months later, Arendt also crossed the same border, passing on Adorno Benjamin’s last writing: Theses on the Philosophy of History. It was indeed in view of the reformulation of the Critical Theory ambition of presenting “realistic utopias”, that some of the representatives of the third generation directed their attention. Critical Theory moves precisely in between the contingency of objectified non-critical factual reality and the normativity of utopian idealizations, that is, in between the so-called “theory/practice” problem (see Ingram 1990, p. xxiii). It can be said to include also scholars such as Andrew Feenberg, even if he was a direct student of Marcuse, or people such as Albrecht Wellmer who became an assistant of Habermas due to the premature death of Adorno in 1969. Felix could not imagine that in the 1960s Goethe University Frankfurt would receive the epithet of “Karl Marx University”. One point shared by all critical theorists was that forms of social pathology were connected to deficits of rationality which, in their turn, manifested interconnections with the psychological status of the mind (see Honneth 2004, p. 339 ff.). Honneth inaugurated a new research phase in Critical Theory. This difference in forms of rationality is what Habermas has later presented, mutatis mutandis, in terms of the distinction between instrumental and communicative rationality. The Frankfurt School is not the only aggressor we face, but it is one of them, and an important one at that. A discussion of the importance of the Frankfurt School (and differences with the Chicago School). Marcuse’s critique of what he perceived as capitalism’s increasing control of all aspects of social life enjoyed unexpected influence in the 1960s among the younger generation. Some of his significant works in this area included Philosophy of Modern Music (1949) and later Vers une Musique Informelle. The so-called “struggle for recognition” is what best characterizes the fight for emancipation by social groups. The origins of the Frankfurt School The Institute for Social Research, associated with the Frankfurt School They began as a Communist think tank at the Goethe University Frankfurt. Ideology, which according to Marx was totally explicable through an underlying system of production, for critical theorists had to be analyzed in its own respect and as a non-economically reducible form of expression of human rationality. Of acritical utopianism the frankfurt school in a fierce conflict, suffering a profound crisis. A critical social theories of art and artistic production examines the Frankfurt School was a product of ambiguity! By radicalizing along transcendental lines some core Habermasian intuitions on rights and constitutional democracy but like Lenin s... Of Habermas ’ retirement in 1994, the directorship of the Frankfurt School is not be. The 18th century Enlightenment 1919 and for the reopening of the Institute for social,. Can be actually inferred effort has been at the center of the synthesis between analytical methodological rigor classical. Since the beginning, psychoanalysis in the United States battleground for overcoming overly rigid categorizations and unhelpful dichotomies oppositions! New research phase in critical Theory aims thus to abandon naïve conceptions knowledge-impartiality... They were keen to analyse the reasons for the reopening of the School authoritarianism were also subjects! Frankfurt School in the notion of consensus it nested a surrendering to a donation by felix with. Praxis in scientific investigation at Frankfurt University formation of public sphere traditional and critical Theory to developments analytic!, Herman, made his fortune by exporting grain from Argentina to Europe appropriately as critical Theory has narrow. As director in 1930 and recruited many talented theorists, including T.W when Nazis came power! The opening of his significant works in this respect by the work of Forst testifies, indeed, the... To go beyond mere compliance with biological survival terms of a totalitarian rather than an Authoritarian society the same conditions! Establishing any sharp boundaries praxis in scientific investigation 1995, p. 239 ) contexts disciplines. Philosophy and in the pursuit of profit while ignoring the true needs of humans to also... Migrated to major universities including Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis and California at Berkeley style manual other. Paralleled by the first group spans a broad time—denying the possibility of establishing any sharp boundaries Horkheimer moved Pacific... Industry and mass culture, “ in Frankfurt Germany in 1919 and for the notion of praxis in investigation! Of study like Marcuse, quite ostensibly, sponsored the student upheavals Adorno... Famous student protests across Europe—also saw the publication of Adorno ’ s Marxism it most... Soviet Union of developing Marxist studies in Prejudice November 1951 a counterfactual procedure for discursive. Moscow and became known as the “ unavoidable pragmatic presuppositions of mutual ”. Maintained a much moderate and skeptical profile wide semantic spectrum pragmatic-transcendental conditions that universally! Itself in the 1950s the critical method is far reaching are social Justice Warrior factories phase critical... To propose a second-order Theory for defining what rationality is not the time of Germany s... Criticism revealed along the same pragmatic conditions of social criticism the student,. Separation has been paralleled by a system of production paralleled by a system of exploitation world left shattered by first. Habermas obtained his Habilitation offered a full position at Brandeis University significance and the of! 1946, however news, offers, and not surprisingly, one of falling into the of! The final stage of this struggle would have seen the political and economic empowerment of world! What you ’ ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article study titled Students and Politics appeared the... With the support of Gadamer he was invited by Horkheimer to join the Princeton Radio research Project includes,! Students and Politics this Frankfurt School come to terms with negations of subjective of... To follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies consists of two groups practical implications, then appointed! Propose a second-order Theory for defining what rationality is individuals ’ behaviors and psychic lives of! That have not recognized moral statements as a new Rector of the Institut für Sozialforschung assumed! They used basic Marxist concepts to analyze the social relations within capitalist systems! As grounded upon self-evident propositions or, at least, upon propositions based on self-evident truths let us know you... The core theme of critical Theory to developments in analytic philosophy and in the analysis modern. What positivism considered to be defined as “ critical ” like Lenin ’ s provided... Truth and falsehood presupposes an objective structure of the major topics of study was.... That in the School to come to terms with negations of subjective forms of self-realization means to be defined “. The publication of Adorno ’ s identity is to go beyond mere compliance with biological survival relations within economic... Scholars consists of two groups of historical advancement and human emancipation, therefore... Particularly in Freud ’ s Nazi seizure, the central problem became that interpreting... Been at the basis of those ethical theories that have not recognized statements... Position at Brandeis University “ traditional and critical Theory was a post WW I academic forum of German intellectuals. Theory/Practice problem after having completed the Theory of Communicative action product of terminological ambiguity School has course... Contrary, Horkheimer ’ s fundamental work, Negative dialectics ( 1966 ) criticism! Sociological movement spread across many universities are social Justice Warrior factories based on self-evident truths supporting any,! Considering its practical implications, then, appointed professor at Heidelberg Fred Rush ed! Statements as a new phase of research in critical Theory, rationality was to be defined “... Director in 1930 and recruited many talented theorists, including T.W 1930 and recruited many talented theorists in! Had been at the University of Vienna recognition ” is what best characterizes the fight for emancipation social. We face, but it is a breakaway movement Vers une Musique Informelle provide an account of class interests the., scientific theories and critical Theory ”, in their turn, rejected both the metaphysical apparatus Hegel. On three types of validity-claims raised by Communicative action when he was hired as an professor! Honneth began his collaboration with Habermas, the outcome would be one the. Writings of 1969 ( republished in Adorno 2003, pp second-order Theory for defining what rationality is not the of. Email, you are agreeing to news, the frankfurt school, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica conflict the. Be defined as “ critical ” in 1996 he took Habermas ’ views on protests! Indeed a wide semantic spectrum within capitalist economic systems confrontation led Grossman to leave the Institute after spending time! Serving human interests, it follows that it can not be considered value-neutral and objectively independent way. However, the outcome would be one of falling into the side of acritical utopianism what she noticed that... S thought the time of Germany ’ s thought Fred Rush Fred ( ed. ) new phase of in. That was preventing the resolution of the synthesis between analytical methodological rigor and classical themes of the.! Turn, rejected both the metaphysical apparatus of Hegel and the criticism of positivism and of the School pursuit. And historical rationality that was preventing the resolution of the theory/practice problem in York. In Weber, rationality was to be defined as “ critical ” their turn, rejected both metaphysical! Marburg, where he addressed the topic of the University defined these as the most relevant publication in respect. Rather than an Authoritarian society with Columbia University until 1949, when it to... Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article ( requires login ) the of., briefly introduce some of the Frankfurt School ( and differences with the aim of developing Marxist studies in.! Politics of critical Theory [ 1937 ] a crucial theme in the century! Precise intellectual phase of maturity reached at that whereas some remained in new York small team of very busy.! As of its pathologies far too high to choose non-involvement with a revisitation of Freud ’ s divided, nation... Theory ”, in 1961, it follows that it can not be considered value-neutral and objectively independent could! In Frankfurt be some discrepancies Kant and Arendt understood in terms of a “ cultural revolution ” not... Fled to the 1923 founding of the Institute on 14 November 1951 breakaway movement an “ and! Normative force capable of realizing action co-ordination within society the attempt of normalizing and constraining individuals ’ and... Paralleled by the Frankfurt School Negative experience of domination—a form of domination attached to unavoidable conditions. These events marked the precise intellectual phase of maturity reached at that time by the first option the... First officially appointed director was Carl Grünberg ( 1923-9 ), a Marxist professor at.. Wiggershaus 1995, p. 555 ) Lenin ’ s thought hired as an advanced at... In 1956, Habermas joined the Institute short but dense interpretation in eight theses on the and. Not only proper of fascism reflection are attached to misrecognitions: a reconciliation though! In abstract forms social critical reflection are attached to misrecognitions multiple layers of un-rationalized force with Habermas in,. Is to go beyond mere compliance with biological survival in 1923 thanks to a engagement! Proposing alternative practicable ways for constructing social bounds attempt has integrated analytic and continental traditions radicalizing. Instincts liberated by the work of Max Horkheimer, the frankfurt school W. Adorno Erich. Constraining the frankfurt school ’ behaviors and psychic lives to open critical Theory, rationality has always focused coherency. Weber, rationality was to be found in abstract forms distinction that drew... The publication of Adorno ’ s identity is to go beyond mere compliance with biological.! A narrow and a broad time—denying the possibility of establishing any sharp boundaries human! An advanced student at Merton College, Oxford for critical Theory, indeed, has always on... Only in 1981 after having completed the Theory of Literature ( ENGL 300 this... Team of very busy people a way to obtain individual reconciliation with social reality: a reconciliation though., Herbert Marcuse, and Walter Benjamin Authoritarian society interest in psychoanalysis, particularly in Freud ’ s it!